Friday, April 6, 2018

Air Flown Trees Landing on a Rooftop

In the Arborist News magazine, there is a series called Detective Dendro - The Diagnostic Sleuth. In the April 2018 edition, The Case of the Rooftop Restaurant written by James Komen (a consulting arborist himself) is a (fictional?) narrative whereby two arborists were invited by a building manager to examine the decline of some olive trees (Olea europaea). The restaurant was built on top of a 40 storey building, and the restaurant's floor, I believe, was suspended above the building roof.


The two arborists were supposed to investigate the eight mature olive trees that the building manager was concerned with. There was a scaffold over the restaurant that supported sun shades that could retract in segments, and duct system for climate control. The building manager shared that 10 years ago, the olive trees were lifted up to the roof with a helicopter in 1.5 m boxes. Since then, the trees have been creating a garden-like environment. However over the last few years, the branches have been dying back and they were pruned off. The arborists noticed that about half the remaining branches had leaves with necrotic tips. Furthermore, each tree had one drip irrgation dripper and below the mulch the soil appeared to have enough moisture. There was a possibility that the duct system, which was used to transport hot air could have dried the leaves but the patten of dieback does not correspond with the location of the duct system. In addition, the problem only started to appear in the last four years. If the hot air was the issue, the symptoms would have appeared almost immediately 10 years ago.


The arborists that suspected that the leaves could have been infected by bacteria, which has been found recently in urban olive trees. The particular bacteria species, Xylella, can cause a systemic infection that restricts the flow of water and result in drought stress symptoms in the leaves. They took leaf samples and then took photos of the drainage system (not obvious in the photo below) and tree containers in the space underneath the restaurant floor. Much later after the site visit, the lab test did not detect Xylella in the leaves or stem tissue. The tree containers were shown to be not much larger than the 1.5m boxes that they were transplanted in, and the arborists deduced that the trees were likely to be root-bound.


One of the arborists dug around a tree container with a trowel and found some adventitious roots, which are produced by trees with issued below ground like girdling roots or poor soil conditions. Girdling roots are a sign that the trees were root-bound, which means that they could have out-grown their containers.


The other arborist calculated the amount of soil volume recommended based on the crown projection (three cubic feet of soil per square foot of crown projection) and found that the soil volume in the container was far less than the recommended amount. He proffered his view that the soil volume for each tree should be larger and there was no way to correct the problem without "demolishing and rebuilding the entire restaurant and steel casings [that suspends the entire floor above the roof]". The arborist counselled the building manager that he could try to keep the trees alive for as long as he could but plan for their eventual replacement, as the tree containers would limit their lifespan.

---

The (fictional?) consultants were observant and knowledgeable enough to consider the duct system across the scaffolding and the possibility of a recent bacteria infection occurence, which turned out to be negative from those olive trees. However, they may not have considered that olive trees does not tolerate too much water and are unhappy in soggy soils. The top few inches of soil should be allowed to dry between waterings, and the irrigation system should be adjusted towards this result. In addition, the drainage system of the tree containers should be checked that it is free from blockage, which would allow excess water to drain freely. The necrotic tips of the leaves and adventitious roots could be symptoms that the trees are receiving too much water from the irrigation system.

While it is likely that the trees have girdling roots and do not have the recommended amount of soil volume in the slightly larger than 1.5m tree containers, the arborists could have offered favourable solutions other than to rebuild the entire restaurant from ground up (or in this case, roof up) or to wait for the trees to die. Perhaps, in order to do improvement work within that crawlspace meant breaking a dozen occupational safety and health rules, and hence the other solutions were not suggested.

Tree roots generally spread three to four times wider than the crown spread, and when trees are grown in containers, the roots tend to spiral around within the container creating a root-bound condition. Roots dessicate when exposed to air, and this principle is how air-pruning pots/containers work - by pruning roots that try to extend outward using air - and solving the root-bound issue.

Image Air-Pot.com

The tree containers could be enlarged by first removing the floor of the restaurant. But that does not mean giving up valuable real estate for the trees' well-being. Next, structural cells (trade name: Silva Cells) could be installed in the enlarged soil space, which would hold up decking or slabs and prevent compaction of the soil. The soil added should be sandy and suitable for the mediterranean climate plants. The opportunity should be taken to upgrade the drainage system. And the sides of the tree containers should be air-pruning panels instead of steel panels.


Image Air-Pot.com

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Singapore Botanic Gardens (SBG), A Short Walk Along "Main Street"

Going past the scene of "the incident". As if nothing happened, but just so happened there was some improvement works.

Taken on 31 Aug 2017 at Palm Valley. As if the Tembusu tree was never there in the first place.
Taken on 31 Aug 2017 at Palm Valley. Note the asphalt patchwork on the pavement.

Taken on 9 Mar 2018 at Palm Valley. Note that the whole stretch of pavement was milled and re-surfaced.

Palaquium obovatum - would exudate a white latax, which is said to form a low quality rubber. Note that this tree was not protected by a barricade.

If people knew that this tree would ooze latax when its bark is cut like the rubber tree, it would be caged up as well.

Like this fella, Hevea brasiliensis or Para Rubber tree. It has some visible "scar marks" on the trunk already.

Hence this notice for people to keep their itchy hands off.

A gift from afar.

Cola gigantea planted by Nelson Mandela when he was president of South Africa in 1997. What is currently happening in South Africa is a shame though.

"its relative, Cola nitida, should be better known as it was the source of the original flavouring used in, and the name given to popular cola drinks such as Coca-cola and Pepsi-cola."
A few decades ago, there was a hoo-ha alleging that Coca-cola and/or Pepsi added cocaine to their drinks, and it was pointed that that was the reason why they were so "addictive".


"seen as a street tree in Singapore, e.g., along Alexandra Road..."
Above, some Cola gigantea photographed along Alexandra Road. Of course, looking nothing like the heritage tree aesthetic-wise.

Some larger Cola gigantea beside Kallang MRT station.

Pity that the trees along this stretch, including the adjacent Ficus trees were crown raised. Photo taken on 24 Oct 2016.

Saturday, March 10, 2018

Specifications for Soil Mixture for General Landscaping Use

Specifications for Soil Mixture for General Landscaping Use
CS A03: 2013


Formerly CS A01:2009 (Specifications for Soil Mixture for General Landscaping Use) and CS A02:2009 (Specifications for Composts and Mulches).

Seems that the Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology (CUGE) have combined the earlier two standards into one. CS A03: 2013 sells for S$10 incl. GST at the Singapore Botanic Gardens Shop.

---

Changes from CS A01:2009 and CS A02:2009 to CS A03: 2013
1.3    Definitions, page 7 -> 1.3    Definitions, page 6

Addition of definitions of Soil Quality, Top Soil, Bioassay, Soil pH, Foreign Matter
Transfer of definitions of Pasteurisation, Compost Maturity, Plant Propagule, Mulch

Added section on soil profile in CS A03: 2013
1.4    Soil Profile, page 9

i.e., O horizon, A horizon, B horizon, C horizon, R horizon

No change from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
1.4    Soil Texture Classification, page 8 -> 1.5    Soil Texture Classification, page 8


Addition from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
1.5    Limits of the Various Classes of Soil Texture, page 9 -> 1.6    Various Classes of Soil Texture, page 11

Composition of sand, silt and clay of different soil textural class.

Changes from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
2.4    Soil Mix Composition, page 18 -> 2.1 Soil Mix Composition, page 12

CS A03: 2013 omitted soil mix composition for "general landscape uses which requires soil mix with higher porosity", and changed the soil mix composition for "general landscape applications" to 3 parts top soil, 2 parts compost and 1 part sand "by dry weight", as opposed to 3 parts clay loam, 2 parts compost and 1 part sand "by volume" in CS A01:2009.

CS A03: 2013 added a note that mixture of ASM by volume (as it was in CS A01:2009) applies only when the components have similar bulk densities. But they do not, as show below (units in g/cm3).
  • Clay loam: 1.45-1.55 [UFL IFAS]
  • Silt loam: 1.4 - 1.55 [UFL IFAS]
  • Sand loam: 1.55-1.75 [UFL IFAS]
  • Top soil: 1.0 - 1.4 [CS A03: 2013]
  • Compost (depends on type): 0.4 - 0.6 [CS A03: 2013]
  • Sand, wet : 1.9
  • Sand, wet, packed: 2                           
  • Sand, dry :1.6 [this figure is used in CS A03: 2013, page 11]
  • Sand, loose :1.45

*UFL IFAS - http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/woody/critical-value.shtml, last modified 27 Feb 2015, accessed on 11 Mar 2018.

CS A03: 2013 continues the note with "However in practice, while mixing the top soil for ASM, soil weight should be based on the moisture content of the soil". Does it mean that the moisture content of the sand and compost components should match the moisture content of the top soil before mixing?

Changes from CS A01:2009 and addition to CS A03: 2013
2.1 Soil Mix Specifications - Physical and Chemical Requirements, page 10 -> 2.1.3  Approved Soil Mix Specification, page 16

Changed values in C:N Ratio, Bulk Density, CEC, Pathogens
Added value in Moisture Content
Deleted Permeability, Heavy Metal Concentration, Organic Contaminants

Added section to CS A03: 2013
2.1.1    Top Soil Specifications - Physical and Chemical Requirements, page 12

Changes from CS A02:2009 and addition to CS A03: 2013
2.4    Physical and Chemical Requirements, page 10 -> 2.1.2    Compost Specifications - Physical and Chemical Requirements

Deleted column for "Mulch"
Added value for Bulk Density
Changed values for Particle Size, Foreign Matter / Physical Contaminents, Pest insects / Invertebrates

Added section in CS A03: 2013
2.1.2.1    Feedstocks for Composting, page 15

Changes from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
2.2 Soil Sampling, page 16 -> 2.2 Soil Sampling, page 11

Deletion of Definition of Landscape Management Unit and Site Analysis
Addition to Number of Samples within a Landscape Management Unit
Added Representative Sampling

Changes from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
2.5 Soil Mixing, page 18 -> 2.3 Soil Mixing, page 17

Deletion from CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
2.6 Basic Tools, page 19

No change in CS A01:2009 to CS A03: 2013
Section 3 - Marking and Documentation -> Section 3 - Marking and Documentation

Not common in practice.

Deletion from CS A02:2009 to CS A03: 2013
2.2 Process Criteria, page 9
2.3 Storage and Protection, page 9
2.6 Product Sampling, page 11
2.7 Application in the field, page 12

Describes how composting should be done and how long it should be composted.
Describes how finished product (matured compost) should be protected from contamination.
Describes how representative samples should be collected.
Describes how compost is used as a soil organic amendment (component of soil mix) and mulch.

Friday, March 9, 2018

Gebiz Spiral Watch

Quotation No.: HDB000ETQ18000011 (Housing and Development Board)

QUOTATION FOR INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES, SURVEYING & RECOMMENDATION FOR NPARKS SUBMISSION FOR THE DEMOLITION OF HDB RESIDENTIAL BLOCKS 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A & 6A AT WOODLANDS CENTRE ROAD

Company A - $4,948 (Awarded)
Company B - $18,000
Company C - $7
Company D - $20,800

Lowest bid is 99.8% lesser than second lowest bid.

But maybe there is confusion over the quantity, leading to one strange quote here.
Assuming there are 1000 nos trees, then the quote by Company C may be $7000. Using this assumption, then the following applies.

Lowest bid is 29.3% lesser than second lowest bid.
Highest bid is 4.2 times (420%) more than lowest bid.

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Uses for Wood from Pruning and Tree Felling

Just putting a thought out here. Locally, can wood with herbal and skincare properties be made into such instead of being sent to the composting factory? Even small quantities of hardwood could be made into small furniture. Would furniture makers and other hobbyists be interested to buy large hardwood logs directly from work crews? Instead of the wood - each over 1 metre in diameter - being sold to timber merchants/hoarders for $70 a piece?

Arboriculture work crews put in blood, sweat and tears, literally, and should deserve more in terms of monetary remunerations.

Even small quantities of wood in the right hardness, quality and/or properties could fetch a pretty penny. Instead of being sold to middlemen, who are only interested in colossal sized hardwood logs.

 The ubiquitous Baphia nitida or Camwood are found as periphery hedges around schools and rubbish centres. It is relatively fast growing, given that it belongs to the Leguminosae family.

 Quite a lot of wood would be taken off every time the crew comes around for pruning. As for the hedge above, the leaves were touching the ground before being pruned, so you could imagine the amount of wood being stacked up.
As a sidenote, this hedge has low and long branches ala the Tembusu tree on the Singapore $5 note, and some are "self-supporting", as they form an arch that touches the ground. I had sat on one such branch before.

 The famous leaning towers of... Acacia confusa.

Close-up

Older Acacias seem to have a tendency of "sudden death".

 Stack of logs from the relatively fast-growing Khaya senegalensis. Even a large log above 1 metre diameter would not fetch much, as so many were being felled nowadays.

These hardwood would be worth more, as the trees are slower-growing and harder than Khaya.
The one lying flat is Casuarina equisetifolia and leaning on it are Cyrtophyllum fragrans (syn.
Fagraea fragrans), or more commonly known as Tembusu.

Monday, February 19, 2018

Accumulation of leaf needles at tree base and other updates

The below would be an update for this post on de-compacting a tree base:
http://openplants.blogspot.sg/2017/05/accumulation-of-years-of-leaves-and.html

Photos taken on 14 Feb 2018.

The tree that I de-compacted the tree base still looked lush as ever, but the tree beside it actually looked worst; the leaf density decreased.

The tree base that I de-compacted (left) is starting to compact again but still appeared flatter than the one on the right.

River bank failure possibly due to high velocity water. Self-sown plants were valiently holding on to the slope face but alas, it was too steep (or the water eroded away the soil it was rooted in).

Location marked with red arrow.

Lastly, one of the last few pages of the book "Trees of Our Garden City, 2nd ed" feature the iconic (at least to me) arching Callistemon viminalis, between the Chinese Garden MRT station and Garden. It was removed I think in 2016 to make way for a cookie-cutter landscaping at the peripheral of the MRT station.

Taken on 22 Sep 2014.

Taken on 14 Feb 2018.


Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Root development limited by surrounding shrubs

Shrubs surrounding a tree, Tabebuia rosea, along a roadside verge at Beach Road may have limited its spread of roots. The area is sheltered by buildings although it was located quite close to the coast. It used to be closer, hence the road name but reclaimation changed the actual moniker.

The tree may have been fine with not spreading its roots too far. But one day the leaf cover of the shrubs were taken off and coupled with the monsoon season, mercilessly dumping large volumes of rainwater onto the relatively small planting verge.

 Taken up one lane

Lifted root plate